Nature Comment: Altmetrics for Alt-Products

One of our goals at ImpactStory is widespread respect for all kinds of research products.  We therefore celebrate the upcoming NSF Policy change to BioSketch requirements, instructing investigators to list their notable Products rather than their Publications in all grant proposals.  Yay!

This policy change, and the resulting need to gather altmetrics across scholarship, is discussed in a Comment just published in Nature, authored by yours truly:

    Piwowar H. (2013). Value all research products., Nature, DOI:

The article is will be behind a paywall but is free for a few days, so run over and read it quickly!  :)

I’ve also written up a few supplementary blog posts to the Comment, on my personal blog:

  • the first draft of the article (quite different, and with some useful details that didn’t make it into the final version)
  • behind-the-scenes look at the editorial and copyright process

And here for convenience is the ImpactStory exemplar mentioned in the article:  a data set on an outbreak of Escherichia coli has received 43 ‘stars’ in the GitHub software repository, 18 tweets and two mentions in peer-reviewed articles (see http://impactstory.org/item/url/https://github.com/ehec-outbreak-crowdsourced/BGI-data-analysis).

One thought on “Nature Comment: Altmetrics for Alt-Products

  1. Pingback: Uncovering the impact of software | ImpactStory blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s